DocBoss offers a number of project metrics that you can use to measure your projects. It’s one of the advantages of using DocBoss over a non-document control specific application such as Microsoft Excel.

Let’s take a closer look at how you can use DocBoss metrics, how we handle workflow and how aspects of reporting are incorporated.

In / Out Metrics

Submittals received:

Files assigned (from submittals):

Submittals sent:

Files sent:

Files per submittal:

Submittals per card:

Average days out (returned files only):

Files sent which have ALSO been returned:

Files processed via auto-reclaim:

Files sent via Ad-Hoc submittals:

Due date metrics

Commitment based

All due date metrics are based on the commitments you have made. Those are measured (and reported to you) based on the DUE DATE for each workflow.

What is a workflow?

A workflow is a period of time punctuated by submittals. A card can be submitted many times. When looking at on time delivery, we want to be sure an measure each commitment, and whether it was upheld. If a card is due and submitted, then due again in the period, it has 2 workflows.

Once a card is submitted, the data associated with its due date is locked.

How are workflows grouped into the report periods?

Workflows appear in the report based on their DUE DATE, not submitted date.

This may require some thought, but it allows us to report on commitments made for each period.

A KEY example:

Assume a report based on a monthly period. If a card workflow has a DUE DATE of FEB 1, but is issued to the customer on JAN 30. That workflow (and on time delivery) is included in the FEB column. It was a commitment for FEBRUARY, which was kept (even if it was executed in January). It IS counted as a a FILE SENT in JAN. (helpful when calculating how much work was done in Jan).

If file is submitted in an earlier period (vs due date), then why not count it in the submitted period?

We could have. There are certainly different ways to view the a similar problem. For us, we decided to base our calculation on the commitment. If you commit to deliver in a certain period, and you meet that commitment, we give you credit in the period of the commitment.

Overall, as long as the analysis is consistent, what might appear in month one as a penalty (or bonus) will be offset in the subsequent period.

Also , we looked at this solution as a consistent measurement that was easily validated. In this case, the due date always establishes the commitment period.

So – yes – could have been different, but the result is the same.

What if a user changes the due date?

In effect, we look at all commitments at the END of a period. This data is drawn from evaluating the historical logs up to the period end date.

If a user changes the due date before the period ends, then it the workflow is not considered a commitment for that period, so if not included in the numbers.

If a user forgets to update the date in one month, but changes it early the next month, it will appear as a missed commitment for the period. It will ALSO appear as another commitment for the next period.

Example: Report is set with period = month. If a card was due on FEB 28, and not submitted, but due date changed on MAR 1, the card would be a failed commitment for the FEB period, and an active commitment for MAR. If the due date was changed on Feb 27 to MAR 30, then the FEB reporting period would not include that card as missed.

Why is there no “on time delivery” metric for SENT files?

The key measurement is whether you are meeting your deliver commitments. If you have 100 cards scheduled for delivery on June 30, and you only send 10 of them, what is the important number? That you were 100% on time for the files you sent, or 10% on time for the commitment you made? Our reporting shows you the later of those values.

Workflow definitions

# of workflows with due dates in period:

Files submitted on time:

Instance on time delivery:

Count of overdue cards:

Avg days overdue (only for overdue docs):

Expected date metrics

# of workflows expected in period:

# of workflows received before expected date:

On time receipt %

General card metrics

Approved

Return to Revise

OUT with Customer

OUT with customer, overdue

OUT with customer, not due yet

Project metrics

Total projects started (or converted from quote to order)

Total projects closed

Reviewer metrics

Average routing TAD for Admin, Tech, Drafter, Construction

Note: All of this data is built from the HISTORY of each individual file, and the scheduled delivery date of the document at the end of each reporting period. So – really, the only way to recreate this data is to look at the history of each card in the project, and follow the entries in the historical record.

e.g: if, in Sept 2019, a card was overdue, and then its due date was updated on Oct 2019 (and it was subsequently returned on time in Oct), it would show in this report as an overdue card in the September report, and an on time return in the October report. It was a long process to get it right, but this is a report built by interpreting the historical record of each card. It cannot be “fudged”.

Ready to leave the
clerical grind behind?

DocBoss is the only true document control system for
suppliers. Book a quick demo to see how we help process
equipment suppliers make more profit with less pain.

Related Resources